Should founders extend their crowdfunding raise? The answer depends on momentum. This week’s Chart of the Week looks at Reg CF raises that extended and closed in January 2025 or later, showing that extensions tend to amplify existing traction rather than create it. Raises with less than $1.3 million initially raised typically brought in about 40% more after extending, while larger raises could more than double their totals. For founders, the takeaway is clear: an extension only works if there’s already investor interest—and a plan to keep that interest alive.

Most investors focus on building wealth.

But what happens after that?

Join Kingscrowd and Zeus Companies for a live conversation with Dr. Steven Kaufman, Founder and CEO of Zeus Companies, on passive real estate income, wealth preservation, and why Zeus focuses on conservative first-lien real estate debt instead of chasing speculative upside.

We’ll discuss:

Can AI modernize the oil industry?

This week on Inside Startup Investing, Pytheas Energy CEO Josh Zuker explains how the company is using predictive analytics and real-time monitoring to revive abandoned oil wells and uncover overlooked energy assets. The conversation explores energy markets, AI infrastructure, oil economics, and why Pytheas sees a massive opportunity in optimizing wells that larger operators leave behind.

Listen in your browser

By Léa Bouhelier-Gautreau \ Deal Report

Brief: Attorney Shield is a legal technology company building an on-demand attorney access platform for police encounters such as traffic stops and arrests. Its mobile app connects members to attorneys through live video while also notifying emergency contacts, turning legal support into a subscription-based service rather than a reactive, after-the-fact expense. Targeting consumers, drivers, families, and potential B2B partners, Attorney Shield aims to make real-time legal guidance more accessible during high-risk interactions.

Léa’s Quick Take: 

Attorney Shield isn't what it looks like. The company is not really selling legal services. It is selling peace of mind during one of the most stressful moments a person can experience: an interaction with law enforcement.

Most people do not know how to handle police questioning or traffic stops. They try to explain themselves, answer unnecessary questions, or accidentally escalate situations. Attorney Shield is built around a simple idea: stop talking and immediately bring in legal representation.

Members open the app and connect with an attorney on live video during encounters with law enforcement. The attorney helps guide the interaction, prevents common constitutional “booby traps” like consenting to searches, and documents the exchange. The focus is not confrontation. It is de-escalation, protection of rights, and helping members get home safely. Surprisingly, the business is pretty lean.  Only one or two attorneys need to be actively on call at a time because actual usage rates are low. Out of close to 9,000 customers, only about 11% use the service at least once per year. That makes the model behave more like insurance than a traditional legal service.

The traction is solid for a company that only launched commercially in April 2024. Revenue grew from roughly $263K in 2024 to about $426K in 2025, monthly recurring revenue reached around $55K. The creator-led marketing engine is another strength. Partnerships with police accountability creators helped generate roughly $160K in presale revenue before launch, and customer footage itself becomes marketing content when members authorize its use.

That said, I still have some concerns.

The company is still losing money on a per-member basis and likely needs additional capital to scale meaningfully. I also think the valuation feels high relative to current revenue, especially because much of the projected growth depends on B2B partnerships that are still extremely early.

Overall, Attorney Shield feels less like a traditional legal-tech startup and more like a modern membership-based protection service built for an era where people increasingly want immediate professional guidance available through their phones.

Smart Cups

By Léa Bouhelier-Gautreau

Smart Cups used to be the darling of StartEngine investors. After winning Gordon Ramsey's Food Stars challenge, the startup raised $1 million in barely 24 hours. But today, it's coming back on Highlander with declining revenues and a lower valuation. Will Smart Cups take the same direction as the show that made it famous, done and forgotten? Or will investors rally to give it one more chance?

Eisana Health

By Teddy Lyons

Eisana has developed a portable cooling system to protect cancer patients from chemotherapy-induced nerve damage in the hands and feet. The company has several patents and already has some human data. However, with just a working prototype, is an $8M valuation cap too high?

NanoNest

By Teddy Lyons

I'm not a huge fan of modular / tiny home companies, but NanoNest caught my eye with it's strong mission of providing homes for disaster relief. The company has executed on $30M in contracts and housed over 1,000 people. However, is the $200M valuation still too rich? 

That's a wrap on this week's issue!

Thanks for reading — your time and attention are what make the Kingscrowd newsletter worth building. If you found something useful this week, forward it to a fellow investor.